COLUMBUS, Ohio — The seventh-ranked Texas A&M men’s tennis team lost the doubles point and couldn’t rally in singles, losing to No. 2 Ohio State 4-1 on Tuesday at the Varsity Indoor Tennis Center.

Ohio State (11-0) won the doubles point and the first singles match to finish for a 2-0 lead. A&M’s No. 3 Valentin Vacherot kept the Aggies (4-1) in the match with a 6-2, 6-3 victory over Justin Boulais at No. 3 singles, but the Buckeyes quickly answered with two more victories for the team win.

A&M will begin play in the ITA Indoor Team Championships against No. 13 Michigan at 9 a.m. Friday at the Nielsen Tennis Stadium in Madison, Wisconsin.

Ohio State 4, Texas A&M 1

Tuesday at the Varsity Indoor Tennis Center, Columbus, Ohio.


(ITA rankings in parentheses)

1. (19) John McNally, Ohio State, def. (14) Hady Habib 6-3, 6-4; 2. (22) Cannon Kingsley, Ohio State, vs. (34) Juan Carlos Aguilar 7-5, 4-6, DNF; 3. (3) Valentin Vacherot, A&M, def. Justin Boulais 6-2, 6-3; 4. (31) Kyle Seelig, Ohio State, def. Noah Schachter 6-2, 6-2; 5. (70) James Trotter, Ohio State, def. Barnaby Smith 6-4, 6-4; 6. Robert Cash (OSU) vs. Guido Marson 7-6 (3), 1-0, DNF


(Ohio State wins team point)

1. (1) John McNally/Robert Cash, Ohio State, def. Juan Carlos Aguilar/Barnaby Smith 6-4; 2. James Trotter/Justin Boulais, Ohio State, vs. Valentin Vacherot/Noah Schachter 6-6, DNF; 3. Kyle Seelig/Cannon Kingsley, Ohio State, def. Pierce Rollins/Stefan Storch 6-4

Order of finish: D3, D1, S4, S3, S1, S5* (*clinched team victory)

Records: A&M (4-1); Ohio State (11-0)

ITA rankings: No. 2 Ohio State; No. 7 A&M

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.